It is currently 07 Sep 10 04:43

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 09:36 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 23 Jul 09 13:45
Posts: 37
During the NJ Wing's West Point trip this year, I ran into a senior member currently involved in ROTC. However, he informed me that he planned on denying his commission, and would enter the Army as a Spec-4 following his graduation. Prior to this, I'd assumed that once you've signed the paperwork, you have to be an officer. Is it in fact possible to deny an ROTC commission, and enter as an enlisted man?

_________________
C/CMSgt Trommer
NER-NJ-059


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 09:53 
Offline
CadetStuff Staff
CadetStuff Staff

Joined: 09 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 9031
Location: In the midst of a Fandango
Do you remember this SM's name? PM me...

_________________
Image

Managing Editor, CadetStuff.org

Don't forget the CadetStuff Wiki. Make your contribution to the global cadet knowledge base today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 10:18 
Offline
Q
Q

Joined: 10 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 5984
Location: Columbia, MO
You can refuse to take the oath, and once you are commissioned you can resign your commission as well. However, once you take that oath you are obligated to meet certain retainability requirements (you have to serve for x amount of time). Upon contracting at the academies or rotc, you assume a retainability obligation that you will commission. If you don't, then they can either force you to enlist, or they can just recoup the money (meaning you have to pay it back out of your pocket), there are all sorts of legal mumbo jumbo involved here.

It does happen that sometimes people get into a program and find out that it's not for them... And sometimes they don't find out until later. Sometimes circumstances change in your life, or your family. There are ways out, but some of those ways come with a price.

However, quite frankly, anyone who *INTENDS* to do this to the system is not worthy of being commissioned in the first place, and is probably fraudulently enrolled in the program now, and may possibly even be committing an actual crime. I'm not really interested in that person even being a specialist, for that matter. It's pretty difficult to prove intent in a matter like this, but it's a pretty serious breach of integrity whether you get caught or not.

Don't be that guy.

_________________
Lieutenant Dan (I got new legs!!!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 20:33 
Offline
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander

Joined: 20 Jun 02 19:00
Posts: 613
Location: Somewhere, out there...
My PAS in ROTC had the general attitude that if you were someone who pulled a stunt like this, they did whatever you didn't want. If you just wanted out, they made you serve and let the MTI's kick your [fourth point of contact] for a bit.

If you thought you'd just enlist and get out and not do anything, they'd make you pay the money back.

But yeah, that's really a toolish thing to do. Just say ahead of time you don't want to do it, that guy should just let his cadre know so they can stop wasting time/money on him. :francis:

_________________
-Andrew


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 20:54 
Offline
Lieutenant
Lieutenant

Joined: 22 Jan 03 09:02
Posts: 464
Location: Maryland
I don't really understand the logic here. He has 3 options after signing the contract.
1. Graduate and get the commission.
2. Break the contract and pay back all funds and/or support the Army spent. This includes any stipends and and scholarship money.
3. Break the contract and enlist at grade E-1, no need to pay back and funds received. There is no provision for going in as an E-4 after breaking the contract.

The option is at the choice of the cadet, not of the Army.

Why would you go through everything and not accept the commission?

_________________
Mark Piersall, Maj, CAP
Frederick Comp. Squadron
MD Wing


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 24 Jul 09 23:35 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator

Joined: 13 Aug 03 10:53
Posts: 3066
Location: 18T VN 01615 53832
I wonder if the cadre know what he's planning to do. Just because he's planning to do this doesn't mean he's actually told them.

_________________
"Whatcha' gonna do, PL?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 25 Jul 09 22:54 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 11 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 24
Location: U.S.
Its fullish to judge his comments without fully knowing the individual's situation. The question was if it i in fact possible to deny a ROTC commission and enter as enlisted. The answer is yes, it is possible. I've witnessed it happen. In fact back in 2003 through 2005 this was increasingly common due to the USAF's force shaping. Whether or not his decision is justified is for him and the AF/Army to decide.


Last edited by etweeker on 25 Jul 09 23:11, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 25 Jul 09 23:08 
Offline
CadetStuff Staff
CadetStuff Staff

Joined: 15 Dec 03 01:54
Posts: 3388
Location: 14RQU5888
I've seen college graduates take the E-3 option over the O-1 option. I can't explain why they would do such a thing ... I don't know if it's a enlisted vs. officer mentality, they don't want the responsibility, they want some of the benefits (if you can call it that) of enlisted over officer ... I really don't know.

What I do know is this:

E-3 <2 Years of service
Base Pay: $19,796.40
BAS: $3,886.44
BAH (CONUS average): $11,424.00
Annual Pay: $35,106.84

O-1 <2 Years of service
Base Pay: $31,863.60
BAS: $2,676.48
BAH (CONUS average): $13,800.00
Annual Pay: $48,340.08

I rest my case.

_________________
Image
Nick McLarty
Senior Developer, CadetStuff.org


Don't forget the CadetStuff Wiki. Make your contribution to the global cadet knowledge base today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 25 Jul 09 23:53 
Offline
Official Grammar Cop

Joined: 25 Aug 03 19:30
Posts: 5337
Location: ... the second star to the right and go straight on till morning...
Unless he/she is married, it is unlikely for an E-3 to draw BAS and BAH.

_________________
Image
Dave Bowles
Maj, CAP
AT1, USN Retired
"The Mitchell Award: Because Just Being Billy Is Bad [FPOC] Enough." (unnumbered)
C/WO, Ret


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 26 Jul 09 01:34 
Offline
CadetStuff Staff
CadetStuff Staff

Joined: 15 Dec 03 01:54
Posts: 3388
Location: 14RQU5888
SarDragon wrote:
Unless he/she is married, it is unlikely for an E-3 to draw BAS and BAH.

That's true ... my bad, I've been getting BAS/BAH since day 1. :) So okay, 2 1/2 years as E-3 to make E-4 BTZ, move out of the dorms, and get BAS/BAH. Even furthers my point.

_________________
Image
Nick McLarty
Senior Developer, CadetStuff.org


Don't forget the CadetStuff Wiki. Make your contribution to the global cadet knowledge base today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 26 Jul 09 13:34 
Offline
Commander
Commander

Joined: 15 Jun 04 22:50
Posts: 1467
Location: Savannah, GA
Hell, I've been an E-5 for over a year and I'm still trapped in the barracks. Just 6 more months and I'll finally get that E-5 BAH (9/11 GI Bill)

_________________
DCC, Effingham Cadet Squadron


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 27 Jul 09 23:25 
Offline
Chief of Staff, U.S. Army Cadet Corps
Chief of Staff, U.S. Army Cadet Corps

Joined: 08 May 05 21:28
Posts: 363
Location: HQ, U.S. Army Cadet Corps
Many years ago, I served a U.S. Navy Quartermaster Second Class (QM2 / E5) who had graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy. For reasons he would never divulge, he did not accept a commission. Evidently, at least at the time, the thought was that a USNA graduate had enough navigation training to become a QM and, when a Midshipman refused to commission, they were instead appointed a QM2, USN with (if I recall correctly) three years of active duty enlisted service.

R,

_________________
Image
JOSEPH M. LAND, SR.
COL, GS, USAC
Chief of Staff http://www.goarmycadets.com
HQ, U.S. Army Cadet Corps

"ADVENTURE BEGINS HERE!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 25 Aug 09 09:05 
Offline
Lieutenant
Lieutenant

Joined: 18 Oct 05 11:15
Posts: 445
Location: USAF Academy, CO
etweeker wrote:
Its fullish to judge his comments without fully knowing the individual's situation. The question was if it i in fact possible to deny a ROTC commission and enter as enlisted. The answer is yes, it is possible. I've witnessed it happen. In fact back in 2003 through 2005 this was increasingly common due to the USAF's force shaping. Whether or not his decision is justified is for him and the AF/Army to decide.

I beleive the angst from above members comes from having seen it happen before. Our class just took the commitment oath a couple weeks ago, and we had classmates leave rather than commit. Happens every year.

_________________
C2C Jim Anderson IV
Cadet Squadron 10
USAF Academy, Class of 2011


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 15 Oct 09 22:42 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 11 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 24
Location: U.S.
Agreed..
I've seen cadets walk right before commission, I've seen those who just took the oath back off and end up enlisted, I've seen the AF let cadets out even after FT with no repercussion. In my years of service and prior as a dependent I've learned that there is one rule: that there is no standard rule. All decisions are made on an individual basis. Why an individual may choose to deny his own commission is that individual's decision and shall be left to his military source to justify his reasoning. Meanwhile everyone else can only speculate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 14 Dec 09 22:33 
Offline
LR, BR, DR Specialist
LR, BR, DR Specialist

Joined: 26 Jan 03 16:03
Posts: 4173
Location: Igloo
I recently found out that one of my cadets from WVU did precisely this - told the Air Force that he didn't want to be a missileer and live at cold bases, wanted to be Spec Ops or a pilot, blah blah blah.

They didn't give him the option to payback the scholarship, but rather got him a contract to BMTS for Security Forces.

Now instead of sitting below the ground in a capsule - he's a Security Forces dude sitting outside guarding topside at an alert facility in Wyoming. Not even joking. I haven't heard from him - but I'm fairly sure that he's probably regretting that career move now.

_________________
Image
"The bottom line is simple: Air Force standards must be uniformly known, consistently applied and non-selectively enforced." -- Gen Fogleman, CSAF, 1995


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 14 Dec 09 23:17 
Offline
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander

Joined: 13 May 04 08:42
Posts: 1107
Location: Lima, OH
SLOGAN wrote:
Now instead of sitting below the ground in a capsule - he's a Security Forces dude sitting outside guarding topside at an alert facility in Wyoming. Not even joking. I haven't heard from him - but I'm fairly sure that he's probably regretting that career move now.


Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. Not smart thinking.

_________________
Aaron C. Hogan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 14 Dec 09 23:50 
Offline
Captain
Captain

Joined: 19 Dec 02 22:03
Posts: 7020
Location: California Republic
AFPC can be pretty vindictive and they are known to hold a grudge or two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 15 Dec 09 00:50 
Offline
Captain
Captain

Joined: 27 Nov 05 10:57
Posts: 2742
SLOGAN wrote:
They didn't give him the option to payback the scholarship, but rather got him a contract to BMTS for Security Forces.


So I'll take it there's no "just kidding" option if you get stuck with an enlisted job you don't like? You have to deny the commissioning first and then roll the (unfriendly) dice?

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 15 Dec 09 02:10 
Offline
CadetStuff Staff
CadetStuff Staff

Joined: 09 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 9031
Location: In the midst of a Fandango
Eclipse wrote:
So I'll take it there's no "just kidding" option if you get stuck with an enlisted job you don't like? You have to deny the commissioning first and then roll the (unfriendly) dice?


Yeah, basically its like this:

Dope: "I don't want a commission after the 4 years of school you put me thru."
AFPC: "OK, here, we'll process your commission denial. Followed by your enlistment."
Dope: "Enlistment? Oh, I suppose.."
AFPC: "OK, here's your drop from your commissioning source. Here, lets swear you in as an enlisted Airman."
Dope: "Wait, whats my job?"
AFPC: "Needs of the service, Airman."
Dope: "Wait, no, I want to pick my job."
AFPC: "No, sorry, that's allowed for first term airmen who don't have a 6 year ROTC scholarship repayment. You, on the other hand, get a nice 'needs of the service' enlistment option. See the document you signed 4 years ago? Remember this?"
Dope: "uhhh, yeah, can I take that commission?"
AFPC: "Oh, no, sorry, we already removed you from ROTC, thus you're no longer eligible for commissioning."
Dope: "So, wait, I still have to enlist?"
AFPC: "Yep, not a question of 'if' its a question of 'now.' I hear Fort Leavenworth is really nice this time of year. Raise your right hand and repeat after me."

_________________
Image

Managing Editor, CadetStuff.org

Don't forget the CadetStuff Wiki. Make your contribution to the global cadet knowledge base today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 15 Dec 09 19:08 
Offline
LR, BR, DR Specialist
LR, BR, DR Specialist

Joined: 26 Jan 03 16:03
Posts: 4173
Location: Igloo
PHall wrote:
AFPC can be pretty vindictive and they are known to hold a grudge or two.

Even more vindictive - his PAS was a missileer...

_________________
Image
"The bottom line is simple: Air Force standards must be uniformly known, consistently applied and non-selectively enforced." -- Gen Fogleman, CSAF, 1995


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 12 Jan 10 19:42 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 11 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 24
Location: U.S.
SLOGAN wrote:
I recently found out that one of my cadets from WVU did precisely this - told the Air Force that he didn't want to be a missileer and live at cold bases, wanted to be Spec Ops or a pilot, blah blah blah.

They didn't give him the option to payback the scholarship, but rather got him a contract to BMTS for Security Forces.

Now instead of sitting below the ground in a capsule - he's a Security Forces dude sitting outside guarding topside at an alert facility in Wyoming. Not even joking. I haven't heard from him - but I'm fairly sure that he's probably regretting that career move now.



100% true.

I don't see why there is so much antipathy with being a missileer... I couldn't have thought of a better opportunity to work on my master's degree. We've had plenty who tried to switch AFSCs shortly after they were told during training they were going to have to "turn the key." Best way to infuriate the Commander is to try to find some loop hole in the system just to suit your private needs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 12 Jan 10 20:19 
Offline
Captain
Captain

Joined: 30 Oct 03 06:19
Posts: 4131
Location: "base, gear, stop"
etweeker wrote:
I don't see why there is so much antipathy with being a missileer... I couldn't have thought of a better opportunity to work on my master's degree.

Ellie, I thought you went to SUPT....?

_________________
Image
Anonymity is a shield from the tyranny of the majority. ... It thus exemplifies the purpose behind the Bill of Rights, and of the First Amendment in particular: to protect unpopular individuals from retaliation...at the hand of an intolerant society. - U.S. Supreme Court, McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 1995


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 12 Jan 10 21:19 
Offline
CadetStuff Staff
CadetStuff Staff

Joined: 09 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 9031
Location: In the midst of a Fandango
etweeker wrote:
I don't see why there is so much antipathy with being a missileer... I couldn't have thought of a better opportunity to work on my master's degree.


Cuz most of the chuckleheads who would do this aren't thinking about master's degrees? They don't see missiles as being "Air Force," but rather: if its not "flying," its "shoe clerking." They were asleep during "The Mission of the United States Air Force" briefings, I guess....

Honestly, the Air Force is probably better off without them.

_________________
Image

Managing Editor, CadetStuff.org

Don't forget the CadetStuff Wiki. Make your contribution to the global cadet knowledge base today!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 12 Jan 10 23:52 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 11 Jan 10 02:41
Posts: 3
Location: Needs of the Air Force
Eclipse wrote:
So I'll take it there's no "just kidding" option if you get stuck with an enlisted job you don't like? You have to deny the commissioning first and then roll the (unfriendly) dice?


The dice aren't necessarily unfriendly. It really is a case-by-case situation - I'm a "reclass" from navigator training, and I put Space/Missiles as my first choice, as it happened space/missiles was in high demand at the moment. A friend of mine from OTS (another reclass) put Space/Missiles as his first choice, but got Civil Engineering since that was his degree. Another friend got S/M initially, but then got switched to Intel since he had a degree in MidEast Studies.

It may be different between enlisted and officer, but as long as you're sincere about your reasoning, you have a better chance of getting something close to what you want than if you're trying to "game the system."

_________________
1Lt, CAP
2Lt, USAF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 13 Jan 10 01:42 
Offline
Captain
Captain

Joined: 19 Dec 02 22:03
Posts: 7020
Location: California Republic
On the enlisted side, at least at BMT, if you came in with a guaranteed AFSC as part of your enlistment contract, they have to give it to you. If you don't get it you have the option is taking a trainee discharge (it's considered honorable, but you get no VA benefits since you weren't in for 180 days) and leaving or staying in and taking what they need that day.
If you come in under an "open" contract then you get what they give you and you have no option other then to take it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 13 Jan 10 12:51 
Offline
Crewman
Crewman

Joined: 11 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 24
Location: U.S.
raivo wrote:
The dice aren't necessarily unfriendly. It really is a case-by-case situation - I'm a "reclass" from navigator training, and I put Space/Missiles as my first choice, as it happened space/missiles was in high demand at the moment. A friend of mine from OTS (another reclass) put Space/Missiles as his first choice, but got Civil Engineering since that was his degree. Another friend got S/M initially, but then got switched to Intel since he had a degree in MidEast Studies.

It may be different between enlisted and officer, but as long as you're sincere about your reasoning, you have a better chance of getting something close to what you want than if you're trying to "game the system."



For whatever reason, Navs have notoriously seen Space and Missiles as an ugly career field. ("If it's not rated, [your job] it doesn't count.") In most of 2009, the majority of IFS/UQT washouts, as well as those officers who knowingly chose to accept being a Nav as their only ticket to commission, got reclassed as 13S. That was in part because of high demand. But it was also an underlying means of it being some sort of punishment for those who chose to. (I heard this first hand from the Nav instructors as well as AFPC at Randolph.) As with everything, there were exceptions to this. Certain individuals who had degrees to match, go reselected to others such as Intel, Maintenance, and Engineering.

Regardless, this created a very negative environment for those who continued on to Missile IQT. Many already had a negative view what the life of a missileer would be like before they even got the chance to see for themselves.

The bottom line is that one shouldn't request a commission with the mindset of only wanting one career field. At the end, it it truly is the needs of the Air Force that come first. So don't be surprised if you don't get what you thought you wanted.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 14 Jan 10 17:11 
Offline
LR, BR, DR Specialist
LR, BR, DR Specialist

Joined: 26 Jan 03 16:03
Posts: 4173
Location: Igloo
etweeker wrote:
In most of 2009, the majority of IFS/UQT washouts, as well as those officers who knowingly chose to accept being a Nav as their only ticket to commission, got reclassed as 13S. That was in part because of high demand. But it was also an underlying means of it being some sort of punishment for those who chose to.

Part is that to get to flight training you have to have your TS done - the Air Force wants to avoid paying for more TS's as much as possible and will reclass those guys to 13S and 33S as long as there are vacancies, and just about anyone with an engineering degree is coming to CE (as well as 13S's that lose PRP or get DUIs that get detailed awating UCMJ actions or reclassing).

_________________
Image
"The bottom line is simple: Air Force standards must be uniformly known, consistently applied and non-selectively enforced." -- Gen Fogleman, CSAF, 1995


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 14 Jan 10 17:27 
Offline
Q
Q

Joined: 10 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 5984
Location: Columbia, MO
SLOGAN wrote:
the Air Force wants to avoid paying for more TS's as much as possible and will reclass those guys to 13S and 33S as long as there are vacancies


33S is going away in October, and being replaced with 17D which also now requires a TS.
It is also going from 5 weeks to 6 months training, and is expected to have a wash-out rate.

_________________
Lieutenant Dan (I got new legs!!!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Denying your commission
PostPosted: 01 Feb 10 12:44 
Offline
Q
Q

Joined: 10 Oct 01 19:00
Posts: 5984
Location: Columbia, MO
dano wrote:
33S is going away in October


Make that April.
Things change fast.

_________________
Lieutenant Dan (I got new legs!!!)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group